1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG TF weights approximately 515 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lancia A 112 | 2006 MG TF | |
| Make | Lancia | MG |
| Model | A 112 | TF |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2380 mm |
