1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia A 112 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Lancia | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |