1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 948 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia A 112 | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2720 mm |