1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1982 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lancia A 112 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A 112 | C |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2761 mm |
