1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lancia A 112 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
