1982 Lancia Beta vs. 2000 Peugeot Kart Up
To start off, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Peugeot Kart Up. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (289 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot Kart Up will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Beta | 2000 Peugeot Kart Up | |
Make | Lancia | Peugeot |
Model | Beta | Kart Up |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1367 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 289 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1090 mm |