1982 Lancia Beta vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Beta (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Beta weights approximately 13 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Beta | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Beta | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 18.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 48 L |