1982 Lancia Beta vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Beta (82 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Beta | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Beta | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1367 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2490 mm |