1982 Lancia Beta vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1134 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1982 Lancia Beta has manual transmission. 1982 Lancia Beta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Beta | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Beta | XC90 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 80 L |