1982 Lancia Gamma vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Gamma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Gamma (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Gamma should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Gamma weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Gamma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lancia Gamma (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Lancia Gamma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lancia Gamma | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Lancia | MCC |
| Model | Gamma | Smart |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 35 L |
