1982 Lancia Prisma vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1982 Lancia Prisma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Prisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Prisma (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Prisma should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Prisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lancia Prisma (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Lancia Prisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Prisma | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Prisma | 66 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63.9 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |