1982 Lancia Prisma vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 1989 Lotus Carlton is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Prisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Prisma would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Prisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (164 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Prisma | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
Make | Lancia | Lotus |
Model | Prisma | Carlton |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3615 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 569 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 289 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |