1982 Lancia Prisma vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Prisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Prisma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Prisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (122 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Prisma | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lancia | Volkswagen |
Model | Prisma | Polo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2470 mm |