1982 Lancia Prisma vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Prisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Prisma would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Prisma. (106 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Prisma.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Prisma | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Prisma | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 55 L |