1982 Lancia Trevi vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Trevi. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Trevi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 694 kg more than 1982 Lancia Trevi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Trevi. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Trevi.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Trevi | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Trevi | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 87 L |