1982 Lancia Trevi vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Trevi (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Trevi weights approximately 545 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lancia Trevi (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Lancia Trevi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lancia Trevi | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Lancia | Tata |
Model | Trevi | Nano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 37 L |