1982 Lincoln Continental vs. 2001 MG X10
To start off, 2001 MG X10 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X10 (195 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X10 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1982 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lincoln Continental | 2001 MG X10 | |
| Make | Lincoln | MG |
| Model | Continental | X10 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
