1982 Lincoln Mark VI vs. 2005 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. (139 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 388 kg more than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. (359 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lincoln Mark VI | 2005 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Mark VI | Titan |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 514 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |