1982 Maserati 420 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati 420 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati 420 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati 420 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 374 kg more than 1982 Maserati 420.

Because 1982 Maserati 420 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati 420. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati 420 (308 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Maserati 420 2009 Mazda 3
Make Maserati Mazda
Model 420 3
Year Released 1982 2009
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2490 cc 1998 cc
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 308 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1554 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2650 mm