1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Maserati | Studebaker |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Commander |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3070 mm |
