1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (202 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (258 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Bi Turbo | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2690 mm |