1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (202 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Maserati | Ford |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |
