1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
