1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (258 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
