1982 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (183 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Maserati | Jeep |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2916 mm |
