1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Merak (158 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Merak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1982 Maserati Merak has manual transmission. 1982 Maserati Merak will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Merak | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Maserati | Ford |
| Model | Merak | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2490 mm |
