1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Merak. (158 HP @ 7100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 370 kg more than 1982 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Merak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Maserati Merak | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Maserati | Toyota |
Model | Merak | Tundra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3270 mm |