1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Merak. (158 HP @ 7100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Maserati Merak weights approximately 290 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1982 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Merak | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | Merak | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2690 mm |
