1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2009 Nissan Qashqai
To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Merak (158 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Maserati Merak.
Because 1982 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Qashqai, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Merak | 2009 Nissan Qashqai | |
| Make | Maserati | Nissan |
| Model | Merak | Qashqai |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
