1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Merak (158 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 1982 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Maserati Merak | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Maserati | Holden |
Model | Merak | Epica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |