1982 Maserati Merak vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 345 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Merak. (158 HP @ 7100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 530 kg more than 1982 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Merak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Maserati Merak | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Maserati | Jaguar |
| Model | Merak | XJ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3157 mm |
