1982 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2001 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2001 Mazda AZ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Because 2001 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1982 Matra-Simca Murena has manual transmission. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | 2001 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
| Model | Murena | AZ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |
