1982 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2006 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2006 Renault Scenic. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Scenic weights approximately 420 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Matra-Simca Murena | 2006 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
Model | Murena | Scenic |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2690 mm |