1982 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Matra-Simca Murena | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Dodge |
Model | Murena | Caliber |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2634 mm |