1982 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK (228 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Matra-Simca Murena | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Murena | SLK |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 228 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4102 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2431 mm |