1982 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 962 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Matra-Simca Murena | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Jeep |
Model | Murena | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1957 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2946 mm |