1982 Mazda 121 vs. 1996 Ford Aspire
To start off, 1996 Ford Aspire is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 121 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1996 Ford Aspire.
Because 1982 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aspire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 121 | 1996 Ford Aspire | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 121 | Aspire |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2310 mm |