1982 Mazda 121 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1226 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 121 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 121 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2916 mm |