1982 Mazda 323 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 898 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 323 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1071 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |
