1982 Mazda 323 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 867 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 323 | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 323 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1071 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1717 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2858 mm |
