1982 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 323 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 323 | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |