1982 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1152 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 323 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | 323 | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2909 mm |