1982 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 323 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Mazda | Smart |
| Model | 323 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 1867 mm |
