1982 Mazda 626 vs. 1976 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 1982 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 626 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Passat.
Because 1982 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 626 | 1976 Volkswagen Passat | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | 626 | Passat |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |
