1982 Mazda 626 vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 461 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 1982 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1982 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 626 | 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 626 | ML |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2860 mm |