1982 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2004 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 525 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 1982 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 626 | 2004 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | 626 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |