1982 Mazda 929 vs. 1996 Volvo V40
To start off, 1996 Volvo V40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V40 (138 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V40 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 929 | 1996 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 929 | V40 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2570 mm |
