1982 Mazda 929 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda 929 (100 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 929 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mazda 929 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 929 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
