1982 Mazda 929 vs. 2004 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Zeta (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 450 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lancia Zeta (180 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 929 | 2004 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Mazda | Lancia |
Model | 929 | Zeta |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |