1982 Mazda 929 vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 929 | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 929 | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2950 mm |